Your independent hometown award-winning newspaper
Ron Muzzall (R), Senate
Why are you seeking office?
My experience in business and governance has provided me with a broad understanding of important issues. I've lived and worked in this district my entire life, giving me an understanding of this district that few have. My moderate perspective and accountability-first attitude not only align with the values of this district but also enable me to work with legislators across the aisle to get things done.
How will you increase funding for public school special education and mental health programs?
The only way to increase funding for these critical programs is to make cuts to other areas and better prioritize the state's top issues. The state's budget has doubled over the last ten years, with little to show for it. We cannot continue raising taxes only to spend the money irresponsibly. We need to assess our top priorities and make wise spending choices so that essential programs, such as special education and mental health in public schools, receive the funding they deserve without making this state unaffordable for people to live in.
Where will significant funding for building "missing middle" housing come from?
The "missing middle" housing crisis is a supply-and-demand issue. No amount of funding alone will solve it. We must reduce frivolous regulations and cut through bureaucratic red tape to make it more affordable and efficient for developers to build. From the state to county and city levels, the permitting process is far too slow, discouraging contractors from building the homes we need. Additionally, we need to reevaluate zoning laws and consider the impacts of the Growth Management Act on this issue.
If I-2109 passes, repealing the tax on long-term capital gains, how will the legislature replace that state funding?
Revenue from the long-term capital gains tax has already been cut in half because people are moving out of state to avoid it. Initially, it raised $900 million, but now it's down to $450 million in just its second year. This tax is unstable and unpredictable and the state cannot rely on it to fund key programs.
Expanding who is subject to the tax would only burden more of our community, many of whom cannot afford it.
If I-2117 passes, repealing the Washington Climate Commitment Act, what legislative acts are needed to replace it?
The Climate Commitment Act has placed an unfair burden on the middle and lower classes by significantly increasing prices for gas, groceries and utilities. Despite the financial strain, we haven't seen data that shows the act has reduced carbon emissions or will at any point of time in the future. With no measurable benefits and a clear link to rising costs of living, the policy should be repealed. I will continue working on initiatives that truly make a positive environmental impact.
What legislative initiatives will reduce usage of gasoline engine vehicles?
We need to focus on energy diversification. There isn't a single renewable energy source that can meet our needs, but several smaller ones can help. We should invest in alternatives like hydrogen and other renewable sources to replace petroleum products and the government should encourage these developments to meet our growing demand for cleaner energy.
Reader Comments(0)